Create Your Own Religion

Epistemology

Religion provides theories for morality, narratives for afterlife that continue conscious experience, and a sense of higher purpose (answers to the question of "why am I here?"). You can answer these questions using science, which is a tool to navigate uncertainty. Certainty isn't a state of mind, it is an emotional feeling. I can be certain that I think though. 

If something is said clearly, that doesn't mean it is true. If something is vague or obscure it may indicate falsehood. If there is a contradiction, there is falsehood. That is how you approach Truth. The science community is the only one I know where you win status points for proving yourself wrong. 

In a dogmatic religious setting, the person you are most afraid to contradict is yourself. Dogma depends on an "infallible leader" or an "infallible text." A source you are not allowed to challenge, or question. That is why it is called blind faith. Curiosity is a wondrous thing, and you should always question authority. I am a fallibilist. 

All knowledge is theory. The common state of knowledge is error and is no shame. The theories we provisionally adopt are the ones that withstand the most rigorous criticism. You can't prove anything (outside of mathematics and logic philosophy). You can only prove something false. I believe objective truth exists, and although we can't pinpoint it– we can infinitely approach it by searching for Truth and finding contradictions. I build upon that and strive for the best explanations.

The future of religion will be decentralized because there can't be a one-size-fits all. Everyone should choose for themselves how they want to live, considering it doesn't harm others. Even still, morality boils down to theories about conscious experience. This is something we can now begin to quantify, visualize, and measure with modern brain science, and by checking physiological markers such as hormone levels in the blood.

Emotional and physical pain are reported to trigger the same regions and process similarly. From here people can hypothesize about and compare different states of being (i.e. suffering vs general wellbeing), examining how thoughts and actions affect themselves and those around them. Even lacking sophisticated instruments people can weigh themselves in the laboratory of their own minds, testing if certain claims to be true.

Traditions, Cultural Appropriation, & Ritual 

 
 

The Four Agreements is a Toltec wisdom book about "the source of self-limiting beliefs that rob us of joy and create needless suffering." The four agreements (listed above) require effort, self-reflection, and honesty. In the short essay Lying Sam Harris "argues that we can radically simplify our lives and improve society by merely telling the truth in situations where others often lie."  

Complementing The Four Agreements (which I've heard humorously referred to as The Forrest Gump strategy), Create Your Own Religion is a "call-to-arms" which basically claims everyone does this already. The world's major religions have many branches, with subscribing individuals picking-and-choosing which texts to live by accordingly. By embracing appropriation, and considering human behavior in different cultures and traditions, we can learn to see doubt as a defense to dogma and uncertainty as an exciting and desirable feature of life.

 
 

Weighing pros and cons, people must decide for themselves how much they apply inclusiveness and exclusiveness policies. My belief is that on the whole openness is essential for a global civilization, and the only policy that would enable us to have one. But regarding smaller groups and communities such as friends, families, and clubs (what-have-you)– that should be left to the mutual discretion of the people maintaining the bonds.

Not believing in a monotheistic God shouldn't eliminate "God" from our vocabularies. Look at nature and see all existence and realize it is a manifestation of the same thing. Like Taoists who embrace paradox – an atheist can believe the universe, and all existence is God. You are a manifestation and expression of God. In that sense, like the Azteks believed, you are God.

Besides providing rituals and ordaining judgements to codify sexuality and community organization, most religions give answers about the afterlife, others don't. Those that don't, tell you to focus on maximizing your happiness in the present life (opposed to sacrificing for the afterlife). However, this causes deep conflicts for a lot of people due to the perceived inevitability of death.

There is serious hope though, the transhumanist movement wants to extend human life indefinitely. I've met Christian, Mormon, Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist, and Muslim transhumanists.

Order and Chaos

Everything is random and Chaos. But order emerges from Chaos. Chaos theory shows randomness is not exactly random. For example, each Oak tree we plant will produce a random Oak tree. We won't be able to predict exactly what it looks like, but we will still have a close idea; we know it won't look like a person. The Mandlebrot set is the graph of randomness. People are often fooled by randomness. James Gleick's book Chaos: Making a New Science explains the significance of Chaos theory, and how it makes modern computers and eventually A.I. possible. 

Patterns - Jason Silva

Truth be told, when I read God in a sentence, I often see it as a metaphor for the Chaos. Disorder unfurling to order.

Some people still believe the mind and soul are separate. All neuro-scientific evidence suggests they are the same. I believe my mind is my soul. You might believe there is an "unchanging soul" or essence in you– I do not believe that is so.

Buddism teaches "the self illusion," meaning there is no self. It doesn't mean it doesn't exist, but it means it is not what it seems. There is no "you" inside of you. You are raw conscious experience. You are the story you tell yourself; you are what you think. The story you tell yourself depends on what you think, what you think others think, and what you think others think of you. Modern neuroscience validates millennia of Buddhist theory.

 

Conscious Experience

Individuals can customize lifestyles, and enjoy the psychological benefits of spirituality without faith in divine providence. 

I'm an atheist (in the monotheistic sense), but technically agnostic. I think near-death experience survivors, people who've had good and bad trips on psychedelics, and conjectures— have collectively informed the legends we have about afterlife.

These are my thoughts on death. When we die we have a DMT trip, and that ride or show our brain experiences when we go out, will reflect whether we felt/or did create more heaven or hell on earth. I also don't think self delusion will be enough to tip the scale in your favor- it will be a genuine reflection of your internal experience and the experiences you gave to others. I don't believe in a literal heaven or hell, I see these as states of consciousness that exist in the real world.

I don't believe in an afterlife. I believe death is likely, but not inevitable (because of modern scientific advancements). I think if my life ends, my conscious experience ends. I am at peace with that, but I don't want it to happen! If I needed an afterlife narrative to cope with fear I would want a "scientific explanation" for heaven or reincarnation. Though I wouldn't want to dull Occam's razor: "among competing hypotheses, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected."

The "scientific" explanation for reincarnation is a theory our consciousness will return to an outside source then be recycled. People who've taken DMT commonly report seeing hyper advanced sentient beings at the end of the trip. Some people have interpreted this as a signal our consciousness exists outside our body and our minds are tuners that receive it. Many people interpret this as the message of psychedelic DMT trips (but good and bad DMT trips could easily be interpreted as peaks at heaven/hell afterlife).

There's also a chance we live in a "matrix" simulation like Elon Musk believes. So the "scientific" explanation for afterlife may be we currently live in a simulation- this theory proposes how it could exist. So while I think that is unsatisfactory and fails Occam's razor, there it is.

I interpret the reported sentience in DMT trips as our deepest subconscious, revealing a fractal blueprint and primordial existential desire. I believe it's our innermost soul that wants it to exist and an indication that information is driven to create that existence (through Chaos and the singularity). An outer sentience-for-us doesn't exist yet. We wish it did exist and people want to create it and become a part of it, symbiotically and as a whole.

Note: we are creatures of information. Our minds literally and physically emerge from the genetic code in our DNA; our minds emerge from and are guided by information. It's no coincidence we have memetic (ideas) and genetic (genes) evolution. Memes and genes are both made of information bits. This is why Kevin Kelly believes technology is emerging as the 7th kingdom of life.

 

Religion Evolves - Baba Brinkman

 
 ArchAngel - Didon

ArchAngel - Didon

 

So even as people may surf the singularity and strive to become superhuman and godlike, the Nordic version of the apocalypse, The Ragnorak, tells a legend where all gods die. Knowledge is power: reflect; it's better to be a warrior in a garden, than a gardener in a war. Stories like this are designed to help us face death, in order to survive.

The big leap with transhumanism does eventually involve augmenting your brain with machines and technology. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency - DARPA already invented the brain-to-machine interface. Mind you, I wouldn't want to do any of this stuff for a long time. Google is also working on the external neocortex (which would allow you to outsource higher level thinking, give you perfect memory, etc). It would "change" who you are in some sense, but you are changing all the time– "the same man never steps in the same river twice." The intent with augmenting your brain would be to evolve it, without ending your conscious experience. Because of neuroplasticity– the location of information in your brain can shift, it's wiring can shift, and your nervous system can link with machines.

 DARPA - Bionic Spine

DARPA - Bionic Spine

 DARPA - Robotic Sense of Touch

DARPA - Robotic Sense of Touch

There are a couple of theories, and time will tell which ones remain the most popular. The one I like is like the "Ship of Theseus." Gradually augmenting your brain, until less and less of it is organic, and eventually none of it is. Your mind is an emergent phenomenon from the genetic code in your DNA. If we create new wetware that is compatible and synced to an internet, the neuroplasticity will allow the locality of your brain to move from one region to another. The goal would be to eventually upload your mind in this way to a blockchain-type-server, through attrition and gradual replacement.
 

Exclusive Interview With Christopher Ryan

Exclusive Interview With Christopher Ryan

On the subject of sex: "What I'm arguing against is the shame that is associated with desire. It's the idea that if you love your husband or wife but you are still attracted to other people that there's something wrong with you, there's something wrong with your marriage, something wrong with your partner. I think a lot of families are fractured by unrealistic expectations that are based upon this false vision of human sexuality." Meet Christopher Ryan, Phd., co-author of the famed New York Times bestseller Sex at Dawn: How We Mate, Why We Stray, and What It Means for Modern Relationships.  It's the winner of renowned scientific awards and referred to as "the single most important book on human sexuality since Aldred Kinsey unleashed Sexual Behavior in the Human Male on the American public in 1948.

Read More

The Niche Apothecary

The Niche Apothecary

Jana has just joined The Niche Apothecary, a blog bringing you the latest discoveries in hard to find, niche, luxury cosmetics and fragrance products from around the world. Jana will be reviewing products she has tried, tested and most importantly fallen in love with. These products are not found in the mass market and many of them have an emphasis on natural and organic ingredients.

Read More

From Monogamy to Polyamory

From Monogamy to Polyamory

What I appreciate about polyamory the most is its flexibility and its emphasis on communication, understanding, honesty, and emotional intelligence. You make your own rules. You stick to them, but you may change them as you need or as your circumstances evolve. You talk about everything with your partner(s).

Nowadays I like entering new relationships that are already open because I learned how to orient myself in an open/poly environment, I know what to expect, and I understand jealousy. However I believe there is something really interesting about starting out in a monogamous relationship and opening it up after a while.

Read More

Curiosity Saved the Cat

Curiosity Saved the Cat

In his influential and oft-quoted book, The World Is Flat, Pulitzer Prize-winning author and pundit Thomas Friedman argues that “IQ still matters, but CQ and PQ—Curiosity Quotient and Passion Quotient—matter even more.” While I personally think that Friedman frequently oversimplifies complex concepts, I ardently agree with his assessment on the importance of curiosity and passion.

Read More

Ridicule

Ridicule

Ridicule is a strong and soft word. Sometimes ridicule is irritating and intolerable, other times it is light-hearted and humorous. Ridicule takes many forms, but deep inside usually contains a form of advice. Sometimes it's senseless and sometimes it's not. It's commentary about what others perceive to be your flaws. Ridicule (in the general sense) points out what others think is wrong with you and your extensions (friends, family, possessions, thoughts, identity), as well as general weaknesses. Sometimes ridicule comes with implied suggestions of how you should be. That is how it takes the form of advice. That doesn't mean we should take that advice, but we should be able to hear it.

Read More

Nicki Minaj - Anaconda

Nicki Minaj - Anaconda

We've always considered Nicki Minaj to be a #jungler by our standards, but it's even more apparent in her latest music video. Minaj's Anaconda just broke the #24hrVevoRecord w/ 19.6M views. In the video Minaj demonstrates she is a formidable minx showing off her beauty, strength, and sexuality. When we watched it here at #polyglamorous, we felt as if the video was made for us

Read More

A Culture At Rest Tends to Stay At Rest

A Culture At Rest Tends to Stay At Rest

I am certainly skeptical of some of the views expressed on this blog. I am neither polyamorous or steeped in the glamor of the fashion industry. I am politically conservative on not only economic but social issues as well, I believe that religion has value that science cannot replace, I hesitate to equate what’s natural with what’s normative, and as a business consultant I spend most of my time in airports and board rooms. Obviously, my beliefs and lifestyle aren’t exactly aligned with the themes of this blog. Yet, Polyglamorous and I have a couple of fundamental beliefs in common. We believe that constant questioning is critical to human progress and that young people today aren't doing enough of it.

Read More